linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fs/proc: timers -- Test for potential index overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 23:28:08 +0300
From:   Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andrey Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/proc: timers -- Test for potential index overflow

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:31:53PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> When showing timer's notify symbolic name make sure we never fetch a value
> sitting outside of the names array. Though the former issue displaying
> timer->it_sigev_notify has been fixed by Thomas in commit cef31d9af9082434,
> better to make sure we won't hit it again on furher modifications.
> 
> v2: Use explicit index overflow test (by tglx@). Since
>     it should never happen add warn-once to notify.
> 
> Cc: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>

Seems the patch is lost due to other duties. Guys, should
I resend it or there some objections?