linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/fault: Decode and print #PF oops in human readable form

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:36:57 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/fault: Decode and print #PF oops in human readable form

Linus pointed out that deciphering the raw #PF error code and printing
a more human readable message are two different things, and also that
printing the negative cases is mostly just noise[1].  For example, the
USER bit doesn't mean the fault originated in user code and stating
that an oops wasn't due to a protection keys violation isn't interesting
since an oops on a keys violation is a one-in-a-million scenario.

Remove the per-bit decoding of the error code and instead print:
  - the raw error code
  - why the fault occurred
  - the effective privilege level of the access
  - the type of access
  - whether the fault originated in user code or kernel code

This provides the user with the information needed to triage 99.9% of
oopses without polluting the log with useless information or conflating
the error_code with the CPL.

Sample output:

    BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address = 0000000000000008
    #PF: supervisor-privileged instruction fetch from kernel code
    #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page

    BUG: unable to handle page fault for address = ffffbeef00000000
    #PF: supervisor-privileged instruction fetch from kernel code
    #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page

    BUG: unable to handle page fault for address = ffffc90000230000
    #PF: supervisor-privileged write access from kernel code
    #PF: error_code(0x000b) - reserved bit violation

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=whk_fsnxVMvF1T2fFCaP2WrvSybABrLQCWLJyCvHw6NKA@mail.gmail.com

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 42 +++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 39dccdfef496..a4421cbd230b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -603,24 +603,9 @@ static void show_ldttss(const struct desc_ptr *gdt, const char *name, u16 index)
 		 name, index, addr, (desc.limit0 | (desc.limit1 << 16)));
 }
 
-/*
- * This helper function transforms the #PF error_code bits into
- * "[PROT] [USER]" type of descriptive, almost human-readable error strings:
- */
-static void err_str_append(unsigned long error_code, char *buf, unsigned long mask, const char *txt)
-{
-	if (error_code & mask) {
-		if (buf[0])
-			strcat(buf, " ");
-		strcat(buf, txt);
-	}
-}
-
 static void
 show_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address)
 {
-	char err_txt[64];
-
 	if (!oops_may_print())
 		return;
 
@@ -651,27 +636,22 @@ show_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long ad
 		pr_alert("BUG: unable to handle page fault for address = %px\n",
 			(void *)address);
 
-	err_txt[0] = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Note: length of these appended strings including the separation space and the
-	 * zero delimiter must fit into err_txt[].
-	 */
-	err_str_append(error_code, err_txt, X86_PF_PROT,  "[PROT]" );
-	err_str_append(error_code, err_txt, X86_PF_WRITE, "[WRITE]");
-	err_str_append(error_code, err_txt, X86_PF_USER,  "[USER]" );
-	err_str_append(error_code, err_txt, X86_PF_RSVD,  "[RSVD]" );
-	err_str_append(error_code, err_txt, X86_PF_INSTR, "[INSTR]");
-	err_str_append(error_code, err_txt, X86_PF_PK,    "[PK]"   );
-
-	pr_alert("#PF error: %s\n", error_code ? err_txt : "[normal kernel read fault]");
+	pr_alert("#PF: %s-privileged %s from %s code\n",
+		 (error_code & X86_PF_USER)  ? "user" : "supervisor",
+		 (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR) ? "instruction fetch" :
+		 (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) ? "write access" :
+					       "read access",
+			     user_mode(regs) ? "user" : "kernel");
+	pr_alert("#PF: error_code(0x%04lx) - %s\n", error_code,
+		 !(error_code & X86_PF_PROT) ? "not-present page" :
+		 (error_code & X86_PF_RSVD)  ? "reserved bit violation" :
+		 (error_code & X86_PF_PK)    ? "protection keys violation" :
+					       "permissions violation");
 
 	if (!(error_code & X86_PF_USER) && user_mode(regs)) {
 		struct desc_ptr idt, gdt;
 		u16 ldtr, tr;
 
-		pr_alert("This was a system access from user code\n");
-
 		/*
 		 * This can happen for quite a few reasons.  The more obvious
 		 * ones are faults accessing the GDT, or LDT.  Perhaps
-- 
2.19.2