[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181221231924.4583e90b@vmware.local.home>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 23:19:24 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4] string.h: Add str_has_prefix() helper function
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
A discussion came up in the trace triggers thread about converting a
bunch of:
strncmp(str, "const", sizeof("const") - 1)
use cases into a helper macro. It started with:
strncmp(str, const, sizeof(const) - 1)
But then Joe Perches mentioned that if a const is not used, the
sizeof() will be the size of a pointer, which can be bad. And that
gcc will optimize strlen("const") into "sizeof("const") - 1".
Thinking about this more, a quick grep in the kernel tree found several
(thousands!) of cases that use this construct. A quick grep also
revealed that there's probably several bugs in that use case. Some are
that people forgot the "- 1" (which I found) and others could be that
the constant for the sizeof is different than the constant (although, I
haven't found any of those, but I also didn't look hard).
I figured the best thing to do is to create a helper macro and place it
into include/linux/string.h. And go around and fix all the open coded
versions of it later.
Note, gcc appears to optimize this when we make it into an always_inline
static function, which removes a lot of issues that a macro produces.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e3e754f2bd18e56eaa8baf79bee619316ebf4cfc.1545161087.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181219211615.2298e781@gandalf.local.home
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wg_sR-UEC1ggmkZpypOUYanL5CMX4R7ceuaV4QMf5jBtg@mail.gmail.com
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Suggestions-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Suggestions-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
Since I haven't heard anything since Linus said he preferred the len
to be the return value, I'm posting this last version before running
it through my tests.
Changes since v3:
- Use size_t instead of int (Joe Perches)
include/linux/string.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/string.h b/include/linux/string.h
index 27d0482e5e05..7927b875f80c 100644
--- a/include/linux/string.h
+++ b/include/linux/string.h
@@ -456,4 +456,24 @@ static inline void memcpy_and_pad(void *dest, size_t dest_len,
memcpy(dest, src, dest_len);
}
+/**
+ * str_has_prefix - Test if a string has a given prefix
+ * @str: The string to test
+ * @prefix: The string to see if @str starts with
+ *
+ * A common way to test a prefix of a string is to do:
+ * strncmp(str, prefix, sizeof(prefix) - 1)
+ *
+ * But this can lead to bugs due to typos, or if prefix is a pointer
+ * and not a constant. Instead use str_has_prefix().
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 if @str does not start with @prefix
+ strlen(@prefix) if @str does start with @prefix
+ */
+static __always_inline size_t str_has_prefix(const char *str, const char *prefix)
+{
+ size_t len = strlen(prefix);
+ return strncmp(str, prefix, len) == 0 ? len : 0;
+}
+
#endif /* _LINUX_STRING_H_ */
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists