[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181222072404.27a7e9a3@vmware.local.home>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:24:04 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] string.h: Add str_has_prefix() helper function
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:33:46 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > +static __always_inline size_t str_has_prefix(const char *str, const char *prefix)
> > +{
> > + size_t len = strlen(prefix);
> > + return strncmp(str, prefix, len) == 0 ? len : 0;
>
> As it already knows the length (and it needs to use it for return
> value), isn't it (slightly) better using memcmp() instead?
No, because we don't know the length of str.
[ str = "h\0[bad memory]" ]
str_has_prefix(str, "TEST THIS BIG STRING AT FRONT")
If we use memcmp(), then we are testing way after str has ended, and
that can cause a memory fault.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists