linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove no need inc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:32:05 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: remove no need inc_nlink

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:41:11AM +0800, yangerkun wrote:
> Remove inc_nlink in debugfs_create_automount, or this inode will never
> be free.
> 
> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
> ---
>  fs/debugfs/inode.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> index 13b0135..9e6e225 100644
> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> @@ -516,8 +516,6 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
>  	inode->i_op = &simple_dir_inode_operations;
>  	inode->i_fop = &simple_dir_operations;
>  
> -	/* directory inodes start off with i_nlink == 2 (for "." entry) */
> -	inc_nlink(inode);

Really?  How did you test this and why does removing this line directly
go against what the comment says?

this feels really wrong...

greg k-h