lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181222192934.GA15237@amd>
Date:   Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:29:34 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] media: wl128x-radio: simplify
 fmc_prepare/fmc_release

On Fri 2018-12-21 02:17:48, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> 
> Remove unused return code from fmc_prepare() and fmc_release() to
> simplify the code a bit.


>  /*
>   * This function will be called from FM V4L2 release function.
>   * Unregister from ST driver.
>   */
> -int fmc_release(struct fmdev *fmdev)
> +void fmc_release(struct fmdev *fmdev)
>  {
>  	static struct st_proto_s fm_st_proto;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!test_bit(FM_CORE_READY, &fmdev->flag)) {
>  		fmdbg("FM Core is already down\n");
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  	}
>  	/* Service pending read */
>  	wake_up_interruptible(&fmdev->rx.rds.read_queue);
> @@ -1611,7 +1606,6 @@ int fmc_release(struct fmdev *fmdev)
>  		fmdbg("Successfully unregistered from ST\n");
>  
>  	clear_bit(FM_CORE_READY, &fmdev->flag);
> -	return ret;
>  }


You probably leave unused variable (ret) here. I guess that's okay as
you remove it later in the series...?

Also... I'd kind of expect _prepare routine to return int. Even if it
currently does not do anything that could return error, I'd kind of
expect allocations being done there...

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ