[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db8937bf-3dd3-f498-d983-ee98582d9f75@embeddedor.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:37:35 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: af_nfc: Fix Spectre v1 vulnerability
On 12/22/18 5:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:47:53 -0600
>
>> proto is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to
>> a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
>>
>> This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
>>
>> net/nfc/af_nfc.c:42 nfc_sock_create() warn: potential spectre issue 'proto_tab' [w] (local cap)
>>
>> Fix this by sanitizing proto before using it to index proto_tab.
>>
>> Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is
>> to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be
>> completed with a dependent load/store [1].
>>
>> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>
> I'll take this directly, and queued up for -stable.
>
Dave,
I wonder if you can take this one too:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181221212229.GA32635@embeddedor/
It's pretty similar to the af_nfc one.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists