[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdf4e1cd-9b28-75c7-6846-6d0f5b816936@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 17:17:55 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Add document to describe Spectre and its
mitigations
On 12/21/18 1:59 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 12/21/18 9:44 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Andi and I have made an update to our draft of the Spectre admin guide.
>> We may be out on Christmas vacation for a while. But we want to
>> send it out for everyone to take a look.
>
> Can you add a section on how to compile out all mitigations that have anything
> beyond negligible performance impact for those running systems where performance
> is more important than security?
>
If you don't worry about security and performance is paramount, then
boot with "nospectre_v2". That's explained in the document.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists