lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 22 Dec 2018 10:24:43 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: fix validation of the block count in
 sanity_check_raw_super

On 2018/12/22 3:28, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Treat "block_count" from struct f2fs_super_block as 64-bit little endian
> value in sanity_check_raw_super() because struct f2fs_super_block
> declares "block_count" as "__le64".
> 
> This fixes a bug where the superblock validation fails on big endian
> devices with the following error:
>   F2FS-fs (sda1): Wrong segment_count / block_count (61439 > 0)
>   F2FS-fs (sda1): Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in 1th superblock
>   F2FS-fs (sda1): Wrong segment_count / block_count (61439 > 0)
>   F2FS-fs (sda1): Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in 2th superblock
> As result of this the partition cannot be mounted.
> 
> With this patch applied the superblock validation works fine and the
> partition can be mounted again:
>   F2FS-fs (sda1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 7c84
> 
> My little endian x86-64 hardware was able to mount the partition without
> this fix.
> To confirm that mounting f2fs filesystems works on big endian machines
> again I tested this on a 32-bit MIPS big endian (lantiq) device.
> 
> Fixes: 0cfe75c5b01199 ("f2fs: enhance sanity_check_raw_super() to avoid potential overflows")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ