[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <093ddec0-1cbd-d5c4-2bbc-8cfb9eddd447@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 10:24:43 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: fix validation of the block count in
sanity_check_raw_super
On 2018/12/22 3:28, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Treat "block_count" from struct f2fs_super_block as 64-bit little endian
> value in sanity_check_raw_super() because struct f2fs_super_block
> declares "block_count" as "__le64".
>
> This fixes a bug where the superblock validation fails on big endian
> devices with the following error:
> F2FS-fs (sda1): Wrong segment_count / block_count (61439 > 0)
> F2FS-fs (sda1): Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in 1th superblock
> F2FS-fs (sda1): Wrong segment_count / block_count (61439 > 0)
> F2FS-fs (sda1): Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in 2th superblock
> As result of this the partition cannot be mounted.
>
> With this patch applied the superblock validation works fine and the
> partition can be mounted again:
> F2FS-fs (sda1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 7c84
>
> My little endian x86-64 hardware was able to mount the partition without
> this fix.
> To confirm that mounting f2fs filesystems works on big endian machines
> again I tested this on a 32-bit MIPS big endian (lantiq) device.
>
> Fixes: 0cfe75c5b01199 ("f2fs: enhance sanity_check_raw_super() to avoid potential overflows")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists