[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181223044553.GG26547@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 23:45:53 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>,
Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] fs-verity: add a documentation file
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:10:07PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Pretty much every file format has the ability to put arbitrary blocks
> of information into a file somewhere the tools which don't know about
> it will skip it. For example, ZIP "includes an extra field facility
> within file headers, which can be used to store extra data not defined
> by existing ZIP specifications, and which allow compliant archivers that
> do not recognize the fields to safely skip them. Header IDs 0–31 are
> reserved for use by PKWARE. The remaining IDs can be used by third-party
> vendors for proprietary usage. " (Wikipedia)
>
> ELF, PNG, PDF and many other formats have the ability to put data
> _somewhere_. It might not be at the tail of the file, but there's
> somewhere to do it.
>
> (I appreciate this isn't what Linus is asking for, but I'm pointing out
> that this is by no means as intractable as you make it sound.)
That design would require the fs-verity code to know the type of eacho
file, and where to find the in-band Merkle tree for each file type
that we wanted to support. And if you wanted to use fs-verity to
protect a sudoers text configuration file (for example), we'd have to
teach sudo how to ignore the userspace visible Merkle tree.
So I agree with you that it's *possible*. But it's ***ugly***. *Way*
uglier than putting the Merkle tree at the end of the file data and
then making it invisible to userspace.
Cheers,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists