[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181224152059.GA26090@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:20:59 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, vbabka@...e.cz, riel@...riel.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
peterz@...radead.org, robin.murphy@....com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
treding@...dia.com, keescook@...omium.org,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
hjc@...k-chips.com, heiko@...ech.de, airlied@...ux.ie,
oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com, joro@...tes.org,
pawel@...iak.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Use vm_insert_range
Having discussed with Matthew offlist, I think we've come to the
following conclusion - there's a number of drivers that buggily
ignore vm_pgoff.
So, what I proposed is:
static int __vm_insert_range(struct vm_struct *vma, struct page *pages,
size_t num, unsigned long offset)
{
unsigned long count = vma_pages(vma);
unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
int ret;
/* Fail if the user requested offset is beyond the end of the object */
if (offset > num)
return -ENXIO;
/* Fail if the user requested size exceeds available object size */
if (count > num - offset)
return -ENXIO;
/* Never exceed the number of pages that the user requested */
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, pages[offset + i]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Maps an object consisting of `num' `pages', catering for the user's
* requested vm_pgoff
*/
int vm_insert_range(struct vm_struct *vma, struct page *pages, size_t num)
{
return __vm_insert_range(vma, pages, num, vma->vm_pgoff);
}
/*
* Maps a set of pages, always starting at page[0]
*/
int vm_insert_range_buggy(struct vm_struct *vma, struct page *pages, size_t num)
{
return __vm_insert_range(vma, pages, num, 0);
}
With this, drivers such as iommu/dma-iommu.c can be converted thusly:
int iommu_dma_mmap(struct page **pages, size_t size, struct vm_area_struct *vma+)
{
- unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
- unsigned int i, count = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- int ret = -ENXIO;
-
- for (i = vma->vm_pgoff; i < count && uaddr < vma->vm_end; i++) {
- ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, pages[i]);
- if (ret)
- break;
- uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
- }
- return ret;
+ return vm_insert_range(vma, pages, PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
and drivers such as firewire/core-iso.c:
int fw_iso_buffer_map_vma(struct fw_iso_buffer *buffer,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
- unsigned long uaddr;
- int i, err;
-
- uaddr = vma->vm_start;
- for (i = 0; i < buffer->page_count; i++) {
- err = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, buffer->pages[i]);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return vm_insert_range_buggy(vma, buffer->pages, buffer->page_count);
}
and this gives us something to grep for to find these buggy drivers.
Now, this may not look exactly equivalent, but if you look at
fw_device_op_mmap(), buffer->page_count is basically vma_pages(vma)
at this point, which means this should be equivalent.
We _could_ then at a later date "fix" these drivers to behave according
to the normal vm_pgoff offsetting simply by removing the _buggy suffix
on the function name... and if that causes regressions, it gives us an
easy way to revert (as long as vm_insert_range_buggy() remains
available.)
In the case of firewire/core-iso.c, it currently ignores the mmap offset
entirely, so making the above suggested change would be tantamount to
causing it to return -ENXIO for any non-zero mmap offset.
IMHO, this approach is way simpler, and easier to get it correct at
each call site, rather than the current approach which seems to be
error-prone.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists