[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7dcdf51-3ade-90b5-aaf6-214e32aecd62@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:37:00 +0530
From: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<vdumpa@...dia.com>, <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <Snikam@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scatterlist: Update size type to support greater then 4GB
size.
We don't have a real use-case for this. Understanding the consequences,
we are questioning the patch in downstream itself.
Please ignore this patch for now.
On 12/12/18 1:36 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> scatterlist elements longer than 4GB sound odd. Please submit it
> in a series with your actual user so that we can help figuring out
> if it really makes sense or if there is a better way to solve your
> problem.
>
> As is this patch will massively increase the memory usage for all users
> of struct scatterlist, so you better have a really good reason.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists