[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181226075330.82462-5-pihsun@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 15:53:12 +0800
From: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Erin Lo <erin.lo@...iatek.com>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org (open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR
(REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM),
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support),
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support)
Subject: [RFC,4/5] rpmsg: add rpmsg support for mt8183 SCP.
Add a simple rpmsg support for mt8183 SCP, that use IPI / IPC directly.
Signed-off-by: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>
---
There are lots of TODO comments on things that are not done yet / I have
doubt on whether it's the best way to do it.
drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h | 3 +
drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 30 ++-
drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c | 2 +-
drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig | 5 +
drivers/rpmsg/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c | 341 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h | 7 +
include/linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h | 34 +++
8 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index ae55fca2ce2d7..cdd4919a402a8 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ struct mtk_scp {
void __iomem *cpu_addr;
phys_addr_t phys_addr;
size_t dram_size;
+
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
};
/**
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index aaebe96bcfd66..0ed7904809dce 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h>
#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
#include "mtk_common.h"
@@ -278,6 +279,24 @@ static int scp_map_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
return 0;
}
+static void scp_add_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+ scp->rpmsg_subdev =
+ mtk_rpmsg_create_rproc_subdev(scp->pdev, scp->rproc);
+ if (scp->rpmsg_subdev) {
+ rproc_add_subdev(scp->rproc, scp->rpmsg_subdev);
+ }
+}
+
+static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+ if (scp->rpmsg_subdev) {
+ rproc_remove_subdev(scp->rproc, scp->rpmsg_subdev);
+ mtk_rpmsg_destroy_rproc_subdev(scp->rpmsg_subdev);
+ scp->rpmsg_subdev = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
static int mtk_scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -301,6 +320,7 @@ static int mtk_scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv;
scp->rproc = rproc;
scp->dev = dev;
+ scp->pdev = pdev;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
@@ -372,13 +392,16 @@ static int mtk_scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
init_waitqueue_head(&scp->run.wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&scp->ack_wq);
+ scp_add_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
+
ret = rproc_add(rproc);
if (ret)
- goto destroy_mutex;
+ goto remove_subdev;
- return ret;
+ return 0;
-destroy_mutex:
+remove_subdev:
+ scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
mutex_destroy(&scp->scp_mutex);
free_rproc:
rproc_free(rproc);
@@ -390,6 +413,7 @@ static int mtk_scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
rproc_del(scp->rproc);
rproc_free(scp->rproc);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
index 6923066869874..1b72c5cc72d36 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct platform_device *pdev,
unsigned long timeout;
int ret;
- if (WARN(id <= IPI_SCP_INIT || id >= IPI_MAX ||
+ if (WARN(id <= IPI_NS_SERVICE || id >= IPI_MAX ||
len > sizeof(send_obj->share_buf) || !buf,
"failed to send ipi message\n"))
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig b/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig
index d0322b41eca54..b8364a397bb60 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig
@@ -55,4 +55,9 @@ config RPMSG_VIRTIO
select RPMSG
select VIRTIO
+config RPMSG_MTK_SCP
+ tristate "MediaTek SCP"
+ depends on MTK_SCP
+ select RPMSG
+
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/Makefile b/drivers/rpmsg/Makefile
index 9aa859502d275..a0c1dcefa36ee 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/Makefile
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_NATIVE) += qcom_glink_native.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM) += qcom_glink_smem.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RPMSG_QCOM_SMD) += qcom_smd.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO) += virtio_rpmsg_bus.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RPMSG_MTK_SCP) += mtk_rpmsg.o
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..66b39eaae51f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+//
+// Copyright 2018 Google LLC.
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+
+#include "rpmsg_internal.h"
+
+// TODO: This is built on top of scp_ipi_register / scp_ipi_send in mtk_scp.h.
+// It's probably better to move the implementation of register / send to here
+// instead of in remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
+// TODO: Do we need some sort of vring for performance? We may be able to get
+// rid of this file if so, but that would require SCP firmware support too.
+
+struct mtk_rpmsg_device {
+ struct rpmsg_device rpdev;
+
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev;
+};
+
+struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint {
+ struct rpmsg_endpoint ept;
+ u32 ipi_id;
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev;
+};
+
+// TODO: Naming is hard...
+struct mtk_rpmsg_rproc_subdev {
+ struct rproc *scp_rproc;
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev;
+ struct rpmsg_endpoint *ns_ept;
+ struct rproc_subdev subdev;
+};
+
+#define to_mtk_subdev(d) container_of(d, struct mtk_rpmsg_rproc_subdev, subdev);
+
+struct mtk_register_device_work {
+ struct work_struct register_work;
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev;
+ char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
+ u32 addr;
+};
+
+/**
+ * TODO: This is copied from virtio_rpmsg_bus.
+ * struct rpmsg_ns_msg - dynamic name service announcement message
+ * @name: name of remote service that is published
+ * @addr: address of remote service that is published
+ *
+ * This message is sent across to publish a new service, or announce
+ * about its removal. When we receive these messages, an appropriate
+ * rpmsg channel (i.e device) is created/destroyed. In turn, the ->probe()
+ * or ->remove() handler of the appropriate rpmsg driver will be invoked
+ * (if/as-soon-as one is registered).
+ */
+struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
+ char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
+ u32 addr;
+} __packed;
+
+#define to_scp_device(r) container_of(r, struct mtk_rpmsg_device, rpdev)
+#define to_scp_endpoint(r) container_of(r, struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint, ept)
+
+static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops mtk_rpmsg_endpoint_ops;
+
+static void __ept_release(struct kref *kref)
+{
+ struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept = container_of(kref, struct rpmsg_endpoint,
+ refcount);
+ kfree(to_scp_endpoint(ept));
+}
+
+static void mtk_rpmsg_ipi_handler(void *data, unsigned int len, void *priv)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint *mept = priv;
+ struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept = &mept->ept;
+
+ // TODO: What if the cb() returns error?
+ (*ept->cb)(ept->rpdev, data, len, ept->priv, mept->ipi_id);
+}
+
+static struct rpmsg_endpoint *
+__rpmsg_create_ept(struct platform_device *scp_pdev, struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
+ rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb, void *priv,
+ u32 id, const char *name)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint *mept;
+ struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
+
+ int ret;
+
+ mept = kzalloc(sizeof(*mept), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mept)
+ return NULL;
+ mept->ipi_id = id;
+ mept->scp_pdev = scp_pdev;
+
+ ept = &mept->ept;
+ kref_init(&ept->refcount);
+
+ ept->rpdev = rpdev;
+ ept->cb = cb;
+ ept->priv = priv;
+ ept->ops = &mtk_rpmsg_endpoint_ops;
+
+ ret = scp_ipi_register(scp_pdev, id, mtk_rpmsg_ipi_handler, name, mept);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&scp_pdev->dev, "ipi register failed, id = %d", id);
+ kref_put(&ept->refcount, __ept_release);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return ept;
+}
+
+static struct rpmsg_endpoint *
+mtk_rpmsg_create_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb, void *priv,
+ struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
+{
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev = to_scp_device(rpdev)->scp_pdev;
+ // TODO: Is using src as IPI id "correct"?
+ return __rpmsg_create_ept(scp_pdev, rpdev, cb, priv, chinfo.src,
+ chinfo.name);
+}
+
+static const struct rpmsg_device_ops mtk_rpmsg_device_ops = {
+ .create_ept = mtk_rpmsg_create_ept,
+};
+
+static void mtk_rpmsg_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
+{
+ kref_put(&ept->refcount, __ept_release);
+}
+
+static int __mtk_rpmsg_send(struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint *mept, void *data,
+ int len, bool wait)
+{
+ // TODO: The "wait" is not same as what scp_ipi_send's "wait" means, so
+ // this is not correct.
+ // (first wait for there's space of tx buffer, second wait for the ack
+ // from scp.)
+ return scp_ipi_send(mept->scp_pdev, mept->ipi_id, data, len,
+ wait ? 200 : 0);
+}
+
+static int mtk_rpmsg_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint *mept = to_scp_endpoint(ept);
+
+ return __mtk_rpmsg_send(mept, data, len, true);
+}
+
+static int mtk_rpmsg_trysend(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_endpoint *mept = to_scp_endpoint(ept);
+
+ return __mtk_rpmsg_send(mept, data, len, false);
+}
+
+static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops mtk_rpmsg_endpoint_ops = {
+ .destroy_ept = mtk_rpmsg_destroy_ept,
+ .send = mtk_rpmsg_send,
+ .trysend = mtk_rpmsg_trysend,
+};
+
+static void mtk_rpmsg_release_device(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_device *mdev = to_scp_device(rpdev);
+
+ kfree(mdev);
+}
+
+static void mtk_register_device_work_function(struct work_struct *register_work)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_device *mdev;
+ struct rpmsg_device *rpdev;
+
+ struct mtk_register_device_work *work = container_of(
+ register_work, struct mtk_register_device_work, register_work);
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev = work->scp_pdev;
+
+ int ret;
+
+ mdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mdev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mdev) {
+ goto free_work;
+ }
+
+ mdev->scp_pdev = scp_pdev;
+
+ rpdev = &mdev->rpdev;
+ rpdev->ops = &mtk_rpmsg_device_ops;
+ rpdev->src = work->addr;
+ rpdev->dst = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
+ strncpy(rpdev->id.name, work->name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
+
+ rpdev->dev.parent = &scp_pdev->dev;
+ rpdev->dev.release = mtk_rpmsg_release_device;
+
+ ret = rpmsg_register_device(rpdev);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&scp_pdev->dev, "rpmsg register device failed\n");
+ goto free_work;
+ }
+ return;
+
+free_work:
+ // TODO: Is it reasonable to free the work itself in the handler?
+ kfree(register_work);
+}
+
+static int mtk_rpmsg_create_device(struct platform_device *scp_pdev,
+ char *name, u32 addr)
+{
+ struct mtk_register_device_work *work;
+
+ // This is called in interrupt context from name service callback.
+ work = kzalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!work)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ INIT_WORK(&work->register_work, mtk_register_device_work_function);
+ work->scp_pdev = scp_pdev;
+ strncpy(work->name, name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
+ work->addr = addr;
+ // rpmsg_register_device can't be called in interrupt context, so need
+ // to schedule a work for it.
+ // TODO: Or should we change mtk_scp to call the callback in
+ // non-interrupt context?
+ schedule_work(&work->register_work);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
+ void *priv, u32 src)
+{
+ struct rpmsg_ns_msg *msg = data;
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev = priv;
+ struct device *dev = &scp_pdev->dev;
+
+ int ret;
+
+ if (len != sizeof(*msg)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "malformed ns msg (%d)\n", len);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * the name service ept does _not_ belong to a real rpmsg channel,
+ * and is handled by the rpmsg bus itself.
+ * for sanity reasons, make sure a valid rpdev has _not_ sneaked
+ * in somehow.
+ */
+ if (rpdev) {
+ dev_err(dev, "anomaly: ns ept has an rpdev handle\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* don't trust the remote processor for null terminating the name */
+ msg->name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
+
+ dev_info(dev, "creating channel %s addr 0x%x\n", msg->name, msg->addr);
+
+ ret = mtk_rpmsg_create_device(scp_pdev, msg->name, msg->addr);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "create rpmsg device failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int mtk_rpmsg_prepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_rproc_subdev *mtk_subdev;
+ struct platform_device *scp_pdev;
+
+ mtk_subdev = to_mtk_subdev(subdev);
+ scp_pdev = mtk_subdev->scp_pdev;
+
+ /* a dedicated endpoint handles the name service msgs */
+ mtk_subdev->ns_ept =
+ __rpmsg_create_ept(scp_pdev, NULL, mtk_rpmsg_ns_cb, scp_pdev,
+ IPI_NS_SERVICE, "name-service");
+ if (!mtk_subdev->ns_ept) {
+ dev_err(&scp_pdev->dev,
+ "failed to create name service endpoint\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void mtk_rpmsg_unprepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_rproc_subdev *mtk_subdev = to_mtk_subdev(subdev);
+
+ kref_put(&mtk_subdev->ns_ept->refcount, __ept_release);
+ // TODO: unregister all rpmsg devices created by name service here.
+}
+
+struct rproc_subdev *
+mtk_rpmsg_create_rproc_subdev(struct platform_device *scp_pdev,
+ struct rproc *scp_rproc)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_rproc_subdev *mtk_subdev;
+ struct device *dev = &scp_pdev->dev;
+
+ mtk_subdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mtk_subdev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mtk_subdev) {
+ dev_err(dev, "allocate rproc subdevice failed.\n");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ mtk_subdev->scp_pdev = scp_pdev;
+ mtk_subdev->scp_rproc = scp_rproc;
+ mtk_subdev->subdev.prepare = mtk_rpmsg_prepare;
+ mtk_subdev->subdev.unprepare = mtk_rpmsg_unprepare;
+
+ return &mtk_subdev->subdev;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_rpmsg_create_rproc_subdev);
+
+void mtk_rpmsg_destroy_rproc_subdev(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
+{
+ struct mtk_rpmsg_rproc_subdev *mtk_subdev = to_mtk_subdev(subdev);
+
+ kfree(mtk_subdev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_rpmsg_destroy_rproc_subdev);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek scp rpmsg driver");
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h
index 118838c91564f..4b3cf4f63fbe9 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mtk_scp.h
@@ -27,7 +27,14 @@ typedef void (*ipi_handler_t) (void *data,
enum ipi_id {
IPI_SCP_INIT = 0,
+ // TODO: Should this just be part of the response of IPI_SCP_INIT
+ // instead? e.g. the initial IPI_SCP_INIT from SCP sends a list of
+ // channels.
+ IPI_NS_SERVICE,
IPI_MDP,
+ // TODO: Since we'll not be having all IPI numbers here after the name
+ // service & rpmsg, this IPI_MAX need to be manually specified and sync
+ // with the firmware.
IPI_MAX,
};
diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h b/include/linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..c55dbd658dde1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.h
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+//
+// Copyright 2018 Google LLC.
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_RPMSG_MTK_RPMSG_H
+#define __LINUX_RPMSG_MTK_RPMSG_H
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG_MTK_SCP)
+
+struct rproc_subdev *
+mtk_rpmsg_create_rproc_subdev(struct platform_device *scp_pdev,
+ struct rproc *scp_rproc);
+
+void mtk_rpmsg_destroy_rproc_subdev(struct rproc_subdev *subdev);
+
+#else
+
+static inline struct rproc_subdev *
+mtk_rpmsg_create_rproc_subdev(struct platform_device *scp_pdev,
+ struct rproc *scp_rproc)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline void mtk_rpmsg_destroy_rproc_subdev(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
+{
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#endif
--
2.20.1.415.g653613c723-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists