linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dmaengine: 8250_mtk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1545819534.28871.93.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Wed, 26 Dec 2018 18:18:54 +0800
From:   Long Cheng <long.cheng@...iatek.com>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
CC:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Ryder Lee" <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
        YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
        Zhenbao Liu <zhenbao.liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dmaengine: 8250_mtk_dma: add MediaTek uart DMA
 support

On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 17:28 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:

......

> > > > > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_device_pause(struct dma_chan *chan)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +       /* just for check caps pass */
> > > > > > +       return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_device_resume(struct dma_chan *chan)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +       /* just for check caps pass */
> > > > > > +       return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > >
> > > Why do you need these? Seems wrong to advertise device_pause/resume
> > > (and the caps) if we don't actually support that?
> > >
> >
> > in serial 8250_dma.c file, when request DMA, will calll
> > 'dma_get_slave_caps' to get the caps. and the will check caps.cmd_pause.
> > the pause is device_pause.  our device can't support the functions. but
> > to check pass, need add the fake function. or you can give better
> > comments. thanks.
> 
> Well, then I guess this is a hack... I'm not too familiar with
> 8250_dma.c, but I guess that if it requires pause/resume to be
> implemented, then we should implement them, not just stub them out...
> 
> Is this something that can be implemented with 8250_mtk DMA?
> 

the HW can't support it.

> Also, I don't see where you need resume, so maybe implementing pause is enough?
> 

yes. pause is enough. for symmetry, add resume function.
anyway, the pause function need to keep.

> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void mtk_uart_apdma_free(struct mtk_uart_apdmadev *mtkd)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +       while (list_empty(&mtkd->ddev.channels) == 0) {
> > > > > > +               struct mtk_chan *c = list_first_entry(&mtkd->ddev.channels,
> > > > > > +                       struct mtk_chan, vc.chan.device_node);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +               list_del(&c->vc.chan.device_node);
> > > > > > +               tasklet_kill(&c->vc.task);
> > > > > > +       }
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_uart_apdma_match[] = {
> > > > > > +       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6577-uart-dma", },
> > > > > > +       { /* sentinel */ },
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_uart_apdma_match);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int mtk_uart_apdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +       struct mtk_uart_apdmadev *mtkd;
> > > > > > +       struct resource *res;
> > > > > > +       struct mtk_chan *c;
> > > > > > +       unsigned int i;
> > > > > > +       int rc;
> > > > > > +

......