linux-kernel - Why is no one discussing this anymore?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d1a036ae6ecc7614d969e841ee2e9d2f@memeware.net>
Date:   Thu, 27 Dec 2018 20:30:36 +0000
From:   vsnsdualce@...eware.net
To:     Raul Miller <rauldmiller@...il.com>
Cc:     visionsofalice@...chan.it, freebsd-women@...ebsd.org,
        freebsd-chat@...ebsd.org,
        OpenBSD general usage list <misc@...nbsd.org>,
        owner-misc@...nbsd.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Why is no one discussing this anymore?

Why is no one discussing this anymore.

It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from 
programmers.

Are you idiots aware that programmers DO NOT KNOW THE LAW simply by 
virtue of being "smarts"?

Are you idiots aware that I am a lawyer, I have studied the law, and I 
do know more than the programmers on this issue (note: I'm also a 
programmer too... but for something useful... like games :) )

Are you idiots aware that Eben Moglen (drafter of the GPLv3 (not 2, 
Linux is under 2)) has NOT made good on his pledge to publish a report 
on how I'm wrong and let me "correct" him where he got it wrong.

Why do you think that is? That in 2 months nothing.

It's because, as a relative who's worked in the field for many decades 
said: he's full of shit.

Anything he publishes would just undermine the stance he's taken.

The license IS recindable at the will of the 1000s of grantors. Any one 
of them could shake the tree.