[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181227234144.GE2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:41:44 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com,
Angelo Ruocco <angelo.ruocco.90@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@...il.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
oleksandr@...alenko.name, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/10] unify the interface of the proportional-share
policy in blkio/io
Hello, Paolo.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:00:14PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 4.21 is coming ... and the legacy proportional share interface will
> be gone with cfq. This will break legacy code using the
> proportional-share interface on top of bfq. This code may just fail
> when trying to use interface files that don't exist any longer.
Sounds like inheriting .cfq namespace would be the easiest. Would
that work?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists