linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 11/46] ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:52:05 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Russell Senior <russell@...sonaltelco.net>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 11/46] ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

commit e58725d51fa8da9133f3f1c54170aa2e43056b91 upstream.

UBIFS's recovery code strictly assumes that a deleted inode will never
come back, therefore it removes all data which belongs to that inode
as soon it faces an inode with link count 0 in the replay list.
Before O_TMPFILE this assumption was perfectly fine. With O_TMPFILE
it can lead to data loss upon a power-cut.

Consider a journal with entries like:
0: inode X (nlink = 0) /* O_TMPFILE was created */
1: data for inode X /* Someone writes to the temp file */
2: inode X (nlink = 0) /* inode was changed, xattr, chmod, … */
3: inode X (nlink = 1) /* inode was re-linked via linkat() */

Upon replay of entry #2 UBIFS will drop all data that belongs to inode X,
this will lead to an empty file after mounting.

As solution for this problem, scan the replay list for a re-link entry
before dropping data.

Fixes: 474b93704f32 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Russell Senior <russell@...sonaltelco.net>
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Reported-by: Russell Senior <russell@...sonaltelco.net>
Reported-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ubifs/replay.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ubifs/replay.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/replay.c
@@ -210,6 +210,38 @@ static int trun_remove_range(struct ubif
 }
 
 /**
+ * inode_still_linked - check whether inode in question will be re-linked.
+ * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
+ * @rino: replay entry to test
+ *
+ * O_TMPFILE files can be re-linked, this means link count goes from 0 to 1.
+ * This case needs special care, otherwise all references to the inode will
+ * be removed upon the first replay entry of an inode with link count 0
+ * is found.
+ */
+static bool inode_still_linked(struct ubifs_info *c, struct replay_entry *rino)
+{
+	struct replay_entry *r;
+
+	ubifs_assert(c, rino->deletion);
+	ubifs_assert(c, key_type(c, &rino->key) == UBIFS_INO_KEY);
+
+	/*
+	 * Find the most recent entry for the inode behind @rino and check
+	 * whether it is a deletion.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry_reverse(r, &c->replay_list, list) {
+		ubifs_assert(c, r->sqnum >= rino->sqnum);
+		if (key_inum(c, &r->key) == key_inum(c, &rino->key))
+			return r->deletion == 0;
+
+	}
+
+	ubifs_assert(c, 0);
+	return false;
+}
+
+/**
  * apply_replay_entry - apply a replay entry to the TNC.
  * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
  * @r: replay entry to apply
@@ -236,6 +268,11 @@ static int apply_replay_entry(struct ubi
 			{
 				ino_t inum = key_inum(c, &r->key);
 
+				if (inode_still_linked(c, r)) {
+					err = 0;
+					break;
+				}
+
 				err = ubifs_tnc_remove_ino(c, inum);
 				break;
 			}