linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 34/46] xfrm_user: fix freeing of xfrm states on acquire

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181228113126.828460603@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:52:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>,
        Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 34/46] xfrm_user: fix freeing of xfrm states on acquire

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>

commit 4a135e538962cb00a9667c82e7d2b9e4d7cd7177 upstream.

Commit 565f0fa902b6 ("xfrm: use a dedicated slab cache for struct
xfrm_state") moved xfrm state objects to use their own slab cache.
However, it missed to adapt xfrm_user to use this new cache when
freeing xfrm states.

Fix this by introducing and make use of a new helper for freeing
xfrm_state objects.

Fixes: 565f0fa902b6 ("xfrm: use a dedicated slab cache for struct xfrm_state")
Reported-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.18+
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/net/xfrm.h    |    1 +
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c |    8 +++++++-
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c  |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1552,6 +1552,7 @@ int xfrm_state_walk(struct net *net, str
 		    int (*func)(struct xfrm_state *, int, void*), void *);
 void xfrm_state_walk_done(struct xfrm_state_walk *walk, struct net *net);
 struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_alloc(struct net *net);
+void xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x);
 struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
 				   const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
 				   const struct flowi *fl,
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -426,6 +426,12 @@ static void xfrm_put_mode(struct xfrm_mo
 	module_put(mode->owner);
 }
 
+void xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
+{
+	kmem_cache_free(xfrm_state_cache, x);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_free);
+
 static void xfrm_state_gc_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
 {
 	tasklet_hrtimer_cancel(&x->mtimer);
@@ -452,7 +458,7 @@ static void xfrm_state_gc_destroy(struct
 	}
 	xfrm_dev_state_free(x);
 	security_xfrm_state_free(x);
-	kmem_cache_free(xfrm_state_cache, x);
+	xfrm_state_free(x);
 }
 
 static void xfrm_state_gc_task(struct work_struct *work)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2288,13 +2288,13 @@ static int xfrm_add_acquire(struct sk_bu
 
 	}
 
-	kfree(x);
+	xfrm_state_free(x);
 	kfree(xp);
 
 	return 0;
 
 free_state:
-	kfree(x);
+	xfrm_state_free(x);
 nomem:
 	return err;
 }