linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/14] clock: milbeaut: Add Milbeaut M10V clock control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c8db56a-6738-e003-5088-0c13588f695a@socionext.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 15:38:58 +0900
From:   "Sugaya, Taichi" <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] clock: milbeaut: Add Milbeaut M10V clock control

Hi

On 2018/12/28 9:39, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sugaya, Taichi (2018-12-25 17:35:27)
>> Hi
>>
>> On 2018/11/30 17:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> +       init.num_parents = parents;
>>>> +       init.parent_names = parent_names;
>>>> +
>>>> +       mcm->cname = clk_name;
>>>> +       mcm->parent = 0;
>>>> +       mcm->hw.init = &init;
>>>> +
>>>> +       clk = clk_register(NULL, &mcm->hw);
>>>> +       if (IS_ERR(clk))
>>>> +               goto err_clk;
>>>> +
>>>> +       of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
>>>> +       return;
>>>> +
>>>> +err_clk:
>>>> +       kfree(mcm);
>>>> +err_mcm:
>>>> +       kfree(parent_names);
>>>> +}
>>>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(m10v_clk_mux, "socionext,milbeaut-m10v-clk-mux",
>>>> +                       m10v_clk_mux_setup);
>>>
>>> Any chance you can use a platform driver?
>>>
>>
>> Excuse me to re-ask you.
>> Why do you recommend to use a platform driver? Is that current fad?
> 
> Not exactly a fad. We've been doing it for some time now. From an older
> email on the list:
> 
> Reasons (in no particular order):
> 
>    1. We get a dev pointer to use with clk_hw_register()
> 
>    2. We can handle probe defer if some resource is not available
> 
>    3. Using device model gets us a hook into power management frameworks
>       like runtime PM and system PM for things like suspend and hibernate
> 
>    4. It encourages a single DT node clk controller style binding
>       instead of a single node per clk style binding
> 
>    5. We can use non-DT specific functions like devm_ioremap_resource() to map
>       registers and acquire other resources, leading to more portable and
>       generic code
> 
>    6. We may be able to make the device driver a module, which will
>       make distros happy if we don't have to compile in all
>       these clk drivers to the resulting vmlinux
> 

Great thanks for answering. I strongly understand.
#It takes a bit of time to send v2.

Best Regards,
Sugaya Taichi