[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181229095215.nbcijqacw5b6aho7@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:52:15 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+7713f3aa67be76b1552c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: account ebt_table_info to kmemcg
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri 28-12-18 17:55:24, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > The [ip,ip6,arp]_tables use x_tables_info internally and the underlying
> > memory is already accounted to kmemcg. Do the same for ebtables. The
> > syzbot, by using setsockopt(EBT_SO_SET_ENTRIES), was able to OOM the
> > whole system from a restricted memcg, a potential DoS.
>
> What is the lifetime of these objects? Are they bound to any process?
No, they are not.
They are free'd only when userspace requests it or the netns is
destroyed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists