[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181228.211503.1983080144355610600.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:15:03 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yuehaibing@...wei.com
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: fib_rules: Fix possible infinite loop in
fib_empty_table
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 16:34:20 +0800
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c b/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
> index f8eb78d..1567e12 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
> @@ -200,9 +200,13 @@ static struct fib_table *fib_empty_table(struct net *net)
> {
> u32 id;
>
> - for (id = 1; id <= RT_TABLE_MAX; id++)
> + for (id = 1; id <= RT_TABLE_MAX; id++) {
> if (!fib_get_table(net, id))
> return fib_new_table(net, id);
> +
> + if (id == RT_TABLE_MAX)
> + break;
> + }
> return NULL;
> }
The loop now has two exit conditions, one of which (by your analysis
is completely impossible).
Please clean this up into a loop with better structure and no
impossible tests. One approach could be simply:
id = 1;
while (1) {
...
if (id++ == RT_TABLE_MAX)
break;
}
Or even:
id = 0;
while (++id) {
...
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists