linux-kernel - Re: [v3 PATCH 1/2] mm: swap: check if swap backing device is congested or not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:42:46 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     ying.huang@...el.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com, minchan@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 1/2] mm: swap: check if swap backing device is
 congested or not

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 05:40:19 +0800 Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> Swap readahead would read in a few pages regardless if the underlying
> device is busy or not.  It may incur long waiting time if the device is
> congested, and it may also exacerbate the congestion.
> 
> Use inode_read_congested() to check if the underlying device is busy or
> not like what file page readahead does.  Get inode from swap_info_struct.
> Although we can add inode information in swap_address_space
> (address_space->host), it may lead some unexpected side effect, i.e.
> it may break mapping_cap_account_dirty().  Using inode from
> swap_info_struct seems simple and good enough.
> 
> Just does the check in vma_cluster_readahead() since
> swap_vma_readahead() is just used for non-rotational device which
> much less likely has congestion than traditional HDD.
> 
> Although swap slots may be consecutive on swap partition, it still may be
> fragmented on swap file. This check would help to reduce excessive stall
> for such case.

Some words about the observed effects of the patch would be more than
appropriate!