linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 30 Dec 2018 12:42:39 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*()

On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:56 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> A grep of the kernel shows that many drivers print an error message if
> they fail to get the irq they're looking for. Furthermore, those drivers
> all decide to print the device name, or not, and the irq they were
> requesting, or not, etc. Let's consolidate all these error messages into
> the API itself, allowing us to get rid of the error messages in each
> driver.

> +static int __platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num, bool warn)
>  {

> +error:
> +       if (warn)
> +               dev_err(&dev->dev, "IRQ index %u not found\n", num);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * platform_get_irq - get an IRQ for a device
> + * @dev: platform device
> + * @num: IRQ number index
> + */
> +int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
> +{
> +       return __platform_get_irq(dev, num, true);

Hmm... Why not just  do
int  ret = __plaform_get_irq();
if (ret)
 dev_err();
return ret;

instead of big refactoring of platform_get_irq()?

>  }



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko