[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181230112502.GA16126@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 12:25:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools headers: move the nolibc header from rcutorture to
tools/include/nolibc/
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > As suggested by Ingo, this header file might benefit other tools than
> > just rcutorture. For now it's quite limited, but is easy to extend, so
> > exposing it into tools/include/nolibc/ will make it much easier to
> > adopt by other tools.
> >
> > The mkinitrd.sh script in rcutorture was updated to use this new location.
> >
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
>
> Thank you, Willy! I have queued all four of these. Should there
> be a MAINTAINERS file entry for the new include/nolibc home for this
> library code?
Very good idea - ack. Could we please also use the opportunity and move
nolibc.h to a more prominent place, like in tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h
or so?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists