linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 13/25] m68k: Dispatch nvram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a09GW_r6L74LtaPKdjcPONk7qweLMuCgrw=7daQ5tBcCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Dec 2018 13:19:03 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/25] m68k: Dispatch nvram_ops calls to Atari or Mac functions

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:12 PM Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2018, LEROY Christophe wrote:

> But I'm over-simplifying. Arnd's alternative actually goes like this,
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_MAC) && !defined(CONFIG_ATARI)
> const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
>         /* ... */
> }
> #elif !defined(CONFIG_MAC) && defined(CONFIG_ATARI)
> const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
>         /* ... */
> }
> #elif defined(CONFIG_MAC) && defined(CONFIG_ATARI)
> const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
>         /* ... */
> }
> #endif
>
> So, you're right, this isn't "duplication", it's "triplication".

Ok, I failed to realized that MAC and ATARI are not mutually exclusive.
I agree that your original version is best then.

       Arnd