lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9iUCPHu0FV9LqMOKixKi7Cg_DC_F04OeXh50YSHOpgkGKejQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:52:52 +0300
From:   Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit

On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 8:47 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 07:56:09PM +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Code does unconditional select for IOSF_MBI. IOSF_MBI driver depends on
> > CONFIG_PCI set but this is not specified anywhere.
>
> I don't have the cover letter or anything for this series, what's going
> on with dependencies?

Here is the executive summary:

I have a changeset that separates ACPI from PCI on 4.21. CONFIG_ACPI
used to select PCI. This is no longer true.

You can build an ACPI system without any PCI devices.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ