[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9iUCPHu0FV9LqMOKixKi7Cg_DC_F04OeXh50YSHOpgkGKejQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:52:52 +0300
From: Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 8:47 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 07:56:09PM +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Code does unconditional select for IOSF_MBI. IOSF_MBI driver depends on
> > CONFIG_PCI set but this is not specified anywhere.
>
> I don't have the cover letter or anything for this series, what's going
> on with dependencies?
Here is the executive summary:
I have a changeset that separates ACPI from PCI on 4.21. CONFIG_ACPI
used to select PCI. This is no longer true.
You can build an ACPI system without any PCI devices.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists