linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "staging:r8188eu: use lib80211 CCMP decrypt"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:38:23 -0600
From:   Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:     Ivan Safonov <insafonov@...il.com>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "staging:r8188eu: use lib80211 CCMP decrypt"

On 1/1/19 3:02 AM, Ivan Safonov wrote:
> I suggested a patch for loading modules from interruptible mode, but this patch 
> remained unclaimed ( 
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-August/124851.html 
> ).
> 
> For some reason I thought that this patch had been removed and did not track the 
> fate of this code ( 
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-August/124573.html 
> ).

That patch was quite extensive, but had only a minimal commit message. I'm 
surprised that it did not get a bad review, but I can see why it was ignored.

Where did you submit that patch? It certainly was never in my mailbox.

Larry