linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Jan 2019 08:56:22 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     sboyd@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, afaerber@...e.de,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for
 Actions Semi

Hi Joe,

On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:12:18AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-01-01 at 00:25 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Add the linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi SoC architecture.
> 
> Unrelated to adding this L: entry
> 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> []
> > @@ -1240,6 +1240,7 @@ ARM/ACTIONS SEMI ARCHITECTURE
> >  M:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> >  R:	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> >  L:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > +L:	linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> >  S:	Maintained
> >  N:	owl
> 
> The N: entry matches too many non-owl entries like:
> 
> Documentation/parport-lowlevel.txt
> drivers/misc/ibmasm/lowlevel.c
> drivers/misc/ibmasm/lowlevel.h
> fs/udf/lowle
> vel.c
> net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> sound/soc/samsung/lowland.c
> 
> Maybe there should be two entries
> 
> N:	/owl
> N:	-owl
> 

Thanks for letting us know. Yes, we need to change it. How about below?

N: owl-
N: -owl

Will do it as a follow-up patch if agreed!

Regards,
Mani

>