| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c09303d8-a74b-a472-485e-2b4ed7f97acf@hauke-m.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 16:50:03 +0100
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mips-fixes] MIPS: BCM47XX: Setup struct device for the SoC
On 1/2/19 1:51 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>
> So far we never had any device registered for the SoC. This resulted in
> some small issues that we kept ignoring like:
> 1) Not working GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP (gpiochip_irqchip_add_key() failing)
> 2) Lack of proper tree in the /sys/devices/
> 3) mips_dma_alloc_coherent() silently handling empty coherent_dma_mask
>
> Kernel 4.19 came with a lot of DMA changes and caused a regression on
> bcm47xx. Starting with the commit f8c55dc6e828 ("MIPS: use generic dma
> noncoherent ops for simple noncoherent platforms") DMA coherent
> allocations just fail. Example:
> [ 1.114914] bgmac_bcma bcma0:2: Allocation of TX ring 0x200 failed
> [ 1.121215] bgmac_bcma bcma0:2: Unable to alloc memory for DMA
> [ 1.127626] bgmac_bcma: probe of bcma0:2 failed with error -12
> [ 1.133838] bgmac_bcma: Broadcom 47xx GBit MAC driver loaded
>
> The bgmac driver also triggers a WARNING:
> [ 0.959486] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.964387] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:516 bgmac_enet_probe+0x1b4/0x5c4
> [ 0.973751] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.976913] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.19.9 #0
> [ 0.982750] Stack : 804a0000 804597c4 00000000 00000000 80458fd8 8381bc2c 838282d4 80481a47
> [ 0.991367] 8042e3ec 00000001 804d38f0 00000204 83980000 00000065 8381bbe0 6f55b24f
> [ 0.999975] 00000000 00000000 80520000 00002018 00000000 00000075 00000007 00000000
> [ 1.008583] 00000000 80480000 000ee811 00000000 00000000 00000000 80432c00 80248db8
> [ 1.017196] 00000009 00000204 83980000 803ad7b0 00000000 801feeec 00000000 804d0000
> [ 1.025804] ...
> [ 1.028325] Call Trace:
> [ 1.030875] [<8000aef8>] show_stack+0x58/0x100
> [ 1.035513] [<8001f8b4>] __warn+0xe4/0x118
> [ 1.039708] [<8001f9a4>] warn_slowpath_null+0x48/0x64
> [ 1.044935] [<80248db8>] bgmac_enet_probe+0x1b4/0x5c4
> [ 1.050101] [<802498e0>] bgmac_probe+0x558/0x590
> [ 1.054906] [<80252fd0>] bcma_device_probe+0x38/0x70
> [ 1.060017] [<8020e1e8>] really_probe+0x170/0x2e8
> [ 1.064891] [<8020e714>] __driver_attach+0xa4/0xec
> [ 1.069784] [<8020c1e0>] bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0xb0
> [ 1.074833] [<8020d590>] bus_add_driver+0xf8/0x218
> [ 1.079731] [<8020ef24>] driver_register+0xcc/0x11c
> [ 1.084804] [<804b54cc>] bgmac_init+0x1c/0x44
> [ 1.089258] [<8000121c>] do_one_initcall+0x7c/0x1a0
> [ 1.094343] [<804a1d34>] kernel_init_freeable+0x150/0x218
> [ 1.099886] [<803a082c>] kernel_init+0x10/0x104
> [ 1.104583] [<80005878>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
> [ 1.110107] ---[ end trace f441c0d873d1fb5b ]---
>
> This patch setups a "struct device" (and passes it to the bcma) which
> allows fixing all the mentioned problems. It'll also require a tiny bcma
> patch which will follow through the wireless tree & its maintainer.
>
> Fixes: f8c55dc6e828 ("MIPS: use generic dma noncoherent ops for simple noncoherent platforms")
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.19+
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
I assume that the old ssb based devices also have such problems did you
had a look into those?
> ---
> arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/bcma/bcma_soc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
> index 6054d49e608e..9339a31a0a87 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,31 @@ void __init plat_mem_setup(void)
> pm_power_off = bcm47xx_machine_halt;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BCM47XX_BCMA
> +static struct device * __init bcm47xx_setup_device(void)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + int err;
> +
> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + err = dev_set_name(dev, "bcm47xx_soc");
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("Failed to set SoC device name: %d\n", err);
> + kfree(dev);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("Failed to set SoC DMA mask: %d\n", err);
> +
> + return dev;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * This finishes bus initialization doing things that were not possible without
> * kmalloc. Make sure to call it late enough (after mm_init).
> @@ -183,6 +208,10 @@ void __init bcm47xx_bus_setup(void)
> if (bcm47xx_bus_type == BCM47XX_BUS_TYPE_BCMA) {
> int err;
>
> + bcm47xx_bus.bcma.dev = bcm47xx_setup_device();
> + if (!bcm47xx_bus.bcma.dev)
> + panic("Failed to setup SoC device\n");
> +
> err = bcma_host_soc_init(&bcm47xx_bus.bcma);
> if (err)
> panic("Failed to initialize BCMA bus (err %d)", err);
> @@ -235,6 +264,7 @@ static int __init bcm47xx_register_bus_complete(void)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_BCM47XX_BCMA
> case BCM47XX_BUS_TYPE_BCMA:
> + device_register(bcm47xx_bus.bcma.dev);
> bcma_bus_register(&bcm47xx_bus.bcma.bus);
> break;
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_soc.h b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_soc.h
> index 7cca5f859a90..72a9a5cf962b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bcma/bcma_soc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bcma/bcma_soc.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #include <linux/bcma/bcma.h>
>
> struct bcma_soc {
> + struct device *dev;
> struct bcma_bus bus;
I would add this to the end, the access to the first member should be
faster.
Hauke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists