linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:34:54 -0600
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>
Cc:     "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI
 dependency explicit


> Please check out this tag next-20181224 and apply the patches afterwards.
Thanks, will do. I think this patchset will uncover additional 
inconsistencies, e.g. for legacy Haswell/Broadwell/Baytrail the machine 
drivers depend on X86_INTEL_LPSS, which depends in turn on PCI, but the 
platform drivers only depend on ACPI, so there is a risk of creating a 
config that makes no sense (or should only be used for COMPILE_TEST)