[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57ed1d94-7f89-20e8-3289-7ef7efd18c20@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:33:06 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI
dependency explicit
I have three opens with this ACPI/PCI change
1. the baseline change fails on my cross-compilation checks, see below
the result of the attached script (simplification of the one I use to
avoid 0day reports).
2. there are different patterns to express the dependency on PCI e.g.
config MMC_SDHCI_ACPI
tristate "SDHCI support for ACPI enumerated SDHCI controllers"
depends on MMC_SDHCI && ACPI
- select IOSF_MBI if X86
+ select IOSF_MBI if (X86 && PCI)
but
config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI
tristate "ACPI HiFi2 (Baytrail, Cherrytrail) Platforms"
default ACPI
- depends on X86 && ACPI
+ depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI
select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM
select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
IOSF is only needed for Baytrail-CR detection, and the code will compile
fine without it, so maybe it'd be a better model if you used the
following diff?
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
index 2fd1b61e8331..68af0ea5c96c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI
select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM
select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
- select IOSF_MBI
+ select IOSF_MBI if PCI
3. All the Intel machine drivers depend on X86_INTEL_LPSS which depends
on PCI. But for Baytrail/Haswell/Broadwell we have only a dependency on
ACPI, so we expose drivers that can be selected but fail on probe since
there are no machine drivers. I am not sure if we want to be strict and
only expose meaningful configurations, or allow for more compilations
tests and corner cases?
-Pierre
cross-compilation issue:
git checkout next-20190102
make CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/gcc-8.1.0-nolibc/ia64-linux/bin/ia64-linux-
--jobs=16 allmodconfig ARCH=ia64
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
YACC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
LEX scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/confdata.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/expr.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/symbol.o
YACC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.h
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.o
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf --allmodconfig Kconfig
arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive dependency detected!
arch/ia64/Kconfig:128: choice <choice> contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
arch/ia64/Kconfig:202: symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM
kernel/power/Kconfig:144: symbol PM is selected by PM_SLEEP
kernel/power/Kconfig:104: symbol PM_SLEEP depends on HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
kernel/power/Kconfig:31: symbol HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS is selected by
HIBERNATION
kernel/power/Kconfig:34: symbol HIBERNATION depends on SWAP
init/Kconfig:250: symbol SWAP depends on BLOCK
block/Kconfig:5: symbol BLOCK is selected by UBIFS_FS
fs/ubifs/Kconfig:1: symbol UBIFS_FS depends on MISC_FILESYSTEMS
fs/Kconfig:227: symbol MISC_FILESYSTEMS is selected by ACPI_APEI
drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig:8: symbol ACPI_APEI depends on ACPI
drivers/acpi/Kconfig:9: symbol ACPI depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI
drivers/acpi/Kconfig:6: symbol ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI is selected by
IA64_HP_SIM
arch/ia64/Kconfig:202: symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice <choice>
For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
View attachment "cross-check._sh" of type "text/plain" (1075 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists