[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hXEqtaiV56sGCOd1VzsRETkS39YiLV-OfnFWiZH4tcAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 22:44:50 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mtd] c4dfa25ab3: kernel_BUG_at_fs/sysfs/file.c
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:53 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
[cut]
> Greg, Rafael: it does strike me that the "BUG_ON()" in
> sysfs_create_file_ns() could easily have been a
>
> if (WARN_ON(..))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> which would have made the machine boot and probably make things easier
> for normal users to report. The kernel test robot doesn't care, but
> non-booting kernels are usually not nice to debug or report for normal
> human beings..
I agree.
This isn't a good enough reason to crash the kernel IMO.
Cheers,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists