linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/20] iommu/mediatek: Move vld_pa_rng into plat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANMq1KAZumH0=iLFgi7=P2mCE4B=7nw_FW9ir4Dwp4M3f8Ukjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:45:30 +0800
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To:     Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
        youlin.pei@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/20] iommu/mediatek: Move vld_pa_rng into plat_data

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 11:58 AM Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Both mt8173 and mt8183 don't have this vld_pa_rng(valid physical address
> range) register while mt2712 have. Move it into the plat_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 ++-
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 8d8ab21..2913ddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
>                          upper_32_bits(data->protect_base);
>         writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
>
> -       if (data->enable_4GB && data->plat_data->m4u_plat != M4U_MT8173) {
> +       if (data->enable_4GB && data->plat_data->vld_pa_rng) {
>                 /*
>                  * If 4GB mode is enabled, the validate PA range is from
>                  * 0x1_0000_0000 to 0x1_ffff_ffff. here record bit[32:30].
> @@ -741,6 +741,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_resume(struct device *dev)
>         .m4u_plat     = M4U_MT2712,
>         .has_4gb_mode = true,
>         .has_bclk     = true,
> +       .vld_pa_rng   = true,
>         .larbid_remap = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9},
>  };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> index b46aeaa..a8c5d1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct mtk_iommu_plat_data {
>         /* HW will use the EMI clock if there isn't the "bclk". */
>         bool                has_bclk;
>         bool                reset_axi;
> +       bool                vld_pa_rng;

Since this is not a register name, maybe we can use something more
readable, like valid_pa_range?

(or at the very least describe it in a comment in the struct?)

>         unsigned char       larbid_remap[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
>  };
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>