[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45756028-c96f-e3b5-389d-d8f022c59c5d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 12:29:33 +0530
From: Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Make sure the affinity to be set is not empty
On 12/20/2018 7:05 PM, Srinivas Ramana wrote:
> If the default_affinity is managed/initialized by a system and
> all the cpus present in irq_default_affinity are hotplugged out
> we may end up passing a cpumask of 0 to irq_do_set_affinity().
>
> Fix this by falling back to cpu_online_mask in case the
> calculated affinity becomes zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index 9dbdccab3b6a..5c0ba5ca5930 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ int irq_setup_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc)
> }
>
> cpumask_and(&mask, cpu_online_mask, set);
> + if (cpumask_empty(&mask))
> + cpumask_copy(&mask, cpu_online_mask);
> +
> if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> const struct cpumask *nodemask = cpumask_of_node(node);
>
>
Hi,
Can you provide your feedback on this?
Thanks,
-- Srinivas R
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists