[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5C2DC132.9050103@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 16:00:50 +0800
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
like.xu@...el.com, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
arei.gonglei@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] KVM/x86: expose MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to
the guest
On 01/03/2019 07:40 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 2:01 AM Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com> wrote:
>> Bits [0, 5] of MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES tell about the format of
>> the addresses stored in the LBR stack. Expose those bits to the guest
>> when the guest lbr feature is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> index 2f82795..eee09b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
>> #define ARCH_PERFMON_BRANCH_MISSES_RETIRED 6
>> #define ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTS_COUNT 7
>>
>> +#define X86_PERF_CAP_MASK_LBR_FMT 0x3f
>> +
>> /*
>> * Intel "Architectural Performance Monitoring" CPUID
>> * detection/enumeration details:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index 7bcfa61..3b8a57b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>> F(XMM3) | F(PCLMULQDQ) | 0 /* DTES64, MONITOR */ |
>> 0 /* DS-CPL, VMX, SMX, EST */ |
>> 0 /* TM2 */ | F(SSSE3) | 0 /* CNXT-ID */ | 0 /* Reserved */ |
>> - F(FMA) | F(CX16) | 0 /* xTPR Update, PDCM */ |
>> + F(FMA) | F(CX16) | 0 /* xTPR Update*/ | F(PDCM) |
>> F(PCID) | 0 /* Reserved, DCA */ | F(XMM4_1) |
>> F(XMM4_2) | F(X2APIC) | F(MOVBE) | F(POPCNT) |
>> 0 /* Reserved*/ | F(AES) | F(XSAVE) | 0 /* OSXSAVE */ | F(AVX) |
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index 8d5d984..ee02967 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -4161,6 +4161,13 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> return 1;
>> msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.ia32_xss;
>> break;
>> + case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
>> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
>> + return 1;
>> + msr_info->data = native_read_msr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
> Since this isn't guarded by vcpu->kvm->arch.lbr_in_guest, it breaks
> backwards compatibility, doesn't it?
Right, thanks. Probably better to change it to below:
msr_info->data = 0;
data = native_read_msr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
if (vcpu->kvm->arch.lbr_in_guest)
msr_info->data |= (data & X86_PERF_CAP_MASK_LBR_FMT);
Best,
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists