linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] dev_pm_opp refcount issue on Arm Juno r0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Jan 2019 16:08:29 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, nm@...com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Douglas Raillard <Douglas.Raillard@....com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] dev_pm_opp refcount issue on Arm Juno r0

On 03-01-19, 10:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> As you already state the checks are unnecessary, if we drop them we don't need
> to add any firmware specific callbacks. I am thinking if it makes sense to
> add a generic helper function to remove the OPPs from a device. If we have
> that any driver needing that can use it. The main reason I think helper is
> useful is that we need exactly same fix for SCMI driver too.
> 
> Thoughts ?

Okay, will do that and fix both the drivers as well.

-- 
viresh