[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALxhOni1b0hS1a7EHFBkzcCx9cT-Z+jy4azrLcFveu6KG944jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:25:20 +0530
From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
To: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: unify system call table generation scripts
Hi Geert,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 17:04, Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
> > +fileguard=_UAPI_ASM_`basename "$out" | sed \
>
> Currently, all but MIPS have the architecture name included in
> the file guard. Shouldn't that be retained?
I was planning to do something similar to this:
-fileguard=_UAPI_ASM_`basename "$out" | sed \
+fileguard=_UAPI_ASM_${ARCH}_`basename "$out" | sed \
But later I thought, the generated file will present inside arch
directory (eg: arch/m68k/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd.h).
So Is that required to mention the architecture name in the file
guard as it is generated inside the respective arch directory?
Thanks
Firoz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists