lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:30:46 +0530
From:   Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: generate uapi header and syscall table header files

Hi Geert,

Thanks for your feedback!

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 17:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > The generated uapi header file will be included in uapi/-
> > asm/unistd.h and generated system call table header file
> > will be included by kernel/syscalltable.S file.
>
> This doesn't really describe what this patch is doing.
> This patch switches m68k over to use the common scripts for
> system call header file generation.

Sure. I'll compose new commit message.

> >  syscall := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall.tbl
> > -syshdr := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscallhdr.sh
> > -systbl := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscalltbl.sh
> > +syshdr := $(srctree)/scripts/syscallhdr.sh
> > +sysnr := $(srctree)/scripts/syscallnr.sh
>
> What's the purpose of adding sysnr?

Yes. This is not really required here. I planned to change the
implementation in some other way, but didn't looks perfect and
this was left here unnoticed.

> >
> > +quiet_cmd_sysnr = SYSNR  $@
> > +      cmd_sysnr = $(CONFIG_SHELL) '$(sysnr)' '$<' '$@'         \
> > +                 '$(sysnr_abis_$(basetarget))'                 \
> > +                 '$(sysnr_pfx_$(basetarget))'                  \
> > +                 '$(sysnr_offset_$(basetarget))'
> > +
>
> What's the purpose of adding this build rule, which is unused?

Sure.

Firoz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ