linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: account ebt_table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALvZod5YSKZvWq13ptbfignECxLVH5H_1YbdvoghrmicuDwuSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Jan 2019 08:18:09 -0800
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot+7713f3aa67be76b1552c@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: account ebt_table_info to kmemcg

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:15 AM William Kucharski
<william.kucharski@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 2, 2019, at 8:14 PM, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> >       countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(tmp.nentries) * nr_cpu_ids;
> > -     newinfo = vmalloc(sizeof(*newinfo) + countersize);
> > +     newinfo = __vmalloc(sizeof(*newinfo) + countersize, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
> > +                         PAGE_KERNEL);
> >       if (!newinfo)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> >       if (countersize)
> >               memset(newinfo->counters, 0, countersize);
> >
> > -     newinfo->entries = vmalloc(tmp.entries_size);
> > +     newinfo->entries = __vmalloc(tmp.entries_size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
> > +                                  PAGE_KERNEL);
> >       if (!newinfo->entries) {
> >               ret = -ENOMEM;
> >               goto free_newinfo;
> > --
>
> Just out of curiosity, what are the actual sizes of these areas in typical use
> given __vmalloc() will be allocating by the page?
>

We don't really use this in production, so, I don't have a good idea
of the size in the typical case. The size depends on the workload. The
motivation behind this patch was the system OOM triggered by a syzbot
running in a restricted memcg.

Shakeel