[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190103172008.GO16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:20:08 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<mazziesaccount@...il.com>, <heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com>,
<mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regmap: regmap-irq/gpio-max77620: add level-irq
support
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 09:42:51AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 07:11:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:05:33AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> >
> > > Last night - just when I was about to get some sleep - it stroke me. I
> > > think the correct thing to do would be leaving the irq_set_type to NULL
> > > for those IRQ chips which do not support type setting. If we do that,
> > > then the irq core will take care of situations where user requests type
> > > setting but the chip does not support it. Which means the regmap-irq
> > > would be no different from any other irq chip where type setting is not
> > > supported.
> >
> > Yes, this is the best fix - let the framework handle things properly.
> > We'll need a second set of operations and to select which to use based
> > on having type information but that's fine.
> >
> > > So at the cost of removing "const" from regmap_irq_chip we could do:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Mark, Geert, what do you think? (And maybe same for the .irq_set_wake -
> > > but I did omit this as I have never looked at the wake functionality
> > > before).
> >
> > We need a separate struct as otherwise if there's multiple devices with
> > regmap irq_chip implementations then they'll collide with each other
>
> Right. I must admit I didn't notice this! I was about to make a nasty
> error there...
>
Looking at the code I think it just copies the struct anyway,
basically using it as a template so I think this should be fine.
> > you're probably right that we need to do the same thing for the wake
> > configuration. I'll still look at applying your patch as a temporary
> > fix though.
>
> Thanks Mark. I try to cook a patch with copying of struct irq_chip still
> at this week but I wont rush it (I have some other topics under work) as
> the regression should be fixed by the other patch.
>
Just to check that is this patch here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181227084443.GA23991@localhost.localdomain/
Just want to check what will be applied so I know it will fix the
regression I am seeing as well.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists