[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49070dc1-2201-1ea7-b9b6-f98663e2cfd2@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 23:18:39 +0530
From: Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: qcom: Add AOSS QMP communication driver
On 12/27/2018 1:58 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 20 Nov 04:22 PST 2018, Arun Kumar Neelakantam wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review Arun.
>
>> On 11/12/2018 1:35 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> [..]
>>> +int qmp_send(struct qmp *qmp, const void *data, size_t len)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (WARN_ON(len + sizeof(u32) > qmp->size)) {
>>> + dev_err(qmp->dev, "message too long\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (WARN_ON(len % sizeof(u32))) {
>>> + dev_err(qmp->dev, "message not 32-bit aligned\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&qmp->tx_lock);
>>> +
>>> + if (!qmp_message_empty(qmp)) {
>>> + dev_err(qmp->dev, "mailbox left busy\n");
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> should it be -EBUSY ?
> That makes more sense.
>
>> And qmp_messge_empty will be done either by remote if it process the data
>> else by this driver in TIMEOUT case, so does we need this check for every TX
>> ? I think we can just reset to Zero once in open time.
> Didn't think about that, should we really make the QMP link ready again
> when we get a timeout? Can we expect that the firmware of the remote
> side is ready to serve future messages?
>
>
> Should we keep this check and remove the writel() below?
I prefer we can just remove this check and keep writel() below same as
down stream.
>
>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* The message RAM only implements 32-bit accesses */
>>> + __iowrite32_copy(qmp->msgram + qmp->offset + sizeof(u32),
>>> + data, len / sizeof(u32));
>>> + writel(len, qmp->msgram + qmp->offset);
>>> + qmp_kick(qmp);
>>> +
>>> + ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(qmp->event,
>>> + qmp_message_empty(qmp), HZ);
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + dev_err(qmp->dev, "ucore did not ack channel\n");
>>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>>> +
>>> + writel(0, qmp->msgram + qmp->offset);
>>> + } else {
>>> + ret = 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +out_unlock:
>>> + mutex_unlock(&qmp->tx_lock);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
> Regards,
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists