linux-kernel - [PATCH] vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Jan 2019 07:48:41 -0500
From:   Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>, <suyanjun218@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel

Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that
if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the peer can't receive
it.

We deep into the code and find that when packet need fragment the smaller
fragment will be encapsulated by ipip not ipcomp. So when the ipip packet
goes into xfrm, it's skb->dev is not properly set. The ipv4 reassembly code
always set skb'dev to the last fragment's dev. After ipv4 defrag processing,
when the kernel rp_filter parameter is set, the skb will be drop by -EXDEV
error.

This patch adds compatible support for the ipip process in ipcomp virtual tunnel.

Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
index de31b30..63de2f6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static int vti_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi,
 
 		XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = tunnel;
 
+		if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_IPIP)
+			skb->dev = tunnel->dev;
+
 		return xfrm_input(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type);
 	}
 
@@ -76,10 +79,15 @@ static int vti_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi,
 
 static int vti_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	__be32 spi = 0;
+	
 	XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET;
 	XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->daddroff = offsetof(struct iphdr, daddr);
+	
+	if (ip_hdr(skb)->protocol == IPPROTO_IPIP)
+		spi = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
 
-	return vti_input(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, 0, 0);
+	return vti_input(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, spi, 0);
 }
 
 static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
@@ -429,6 +437,12 @@ static struct xfrm4_protocol vti_ipcomp4_protocol __read_mostly = {
 	.priority	=	100,
 };
 
+static struct xfrm_tunnel ipip_handler __read_mostly = {
+	.handler	=	vti_rcv,
+	.err_handler	=	vti4_err,
+	.priority	=	0,
+};
+
 static int __net_init vti_init_net(struct net *net)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -597,6 +611,13 @@ static int __init vti_init(void)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto xfrm_proto_comp_failed;
 
+	msg = "ipip tunnel";
+	err = xfrm4_tunnel_register(&ipip_handler, AF_INET);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		pr_info("%s: cant't register tunnel\n",__func__);
+		goto xfrm_tunnel_failed;
+	}
+
 	msg = "netlink interface";
 	err = rtnl_link_register(&vti_link_ops);
 	if (err < 0)
@@ -606,6 +627,8 @@ static int __init vti_init(void)
 
 rtnl_link_failed:
 	xfrm4_protocol_deregister(&vti_ipcomp4_protocol, IPPROTO_COMP);
+xfrm_tunnel_failed:
+	xfrm4_tunnel_deregister(&ipip_handler, AF_INET);
 xfrm_proto_comp_failed:
 	xfrm4_protocol_deregister(&vti_ah4_protocol, IPPROTO_AH);
 xfrm_proto_ah_failed:
-- 
2.7.4