linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 03 Jan 2019 09:38:20 +0530
From:   Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 5:20:27 AM IST Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> On 1/2/19 4:58 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch.
> >>>
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive dependency detected!
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:    choice <choice> contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:202:    symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM
> >>>
> >>> IA64_HP_SIM is both a choice and is selected.
> >>>
> >>> I did allyesconfig and disabled PCI afterwards to find all the issues
> >>> on this patchset.
> >> Are you saying there's a newer series that fixes this issue for both
> >> allyesconfig and allmodconfig?
> >>
> >> if yes, then we're good.
> >
> > No, I haven't fixed ia64 kconfig issue. That's somebody else's job. I
> > used allyesconfig to find out all compilation issues on x86 arch to
> > come up with this patchset.
> 
> Nothing makes me cringe more than "somebody else's job" statements. In 
> this case, there is obviously a correlation with your ACPI changes since 
> the circular dependency happens because of the ACPI symbol.
> 
> arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:error: recursive dependency detected!
> arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:    choice <choice> contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
> arch/ia64/Kconfig:200:    symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM
> kernel/power/Kconfig:144:    symbol PM is selected by PM_SLEEP
> kernel/power/Kconfig:104:    symbol PM_SLEEP depends on HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
> kernel/power/Kconfig:31:    symbol HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS is selected by 
> HIBERNATION
> kernel/power/Kconfig:34:    symbol HIBERNATION depends on SWAP
> init/Kconfig:250:    symbol SWAP depends on BLOCK
> block/Kconfig:5:    symbol BLOCK is selected by UBIFS_FS
> fs/ubifs/Kconfig:1:    symbol UBIFS_FS depends on MISC_FILESYSTEMS
> fs/Kconfig:220:    symbol MISC_FILESYSTEMS is selected by ACPI_APEI
> drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig:8:    symbol ACPI_APEI depends on ACPI
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig:9:    symbol ACPI depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI 
> <<<< LOOK HERE
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig:6:    symbol ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI is selected by 
> IA64_HP_SIM
> arch/ia64/Kconfig:200:    symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice <choice>
> 
> At any rate, a 3 mn git bisect tells me the circular dependency is 
> exposed by this change:
> 
> f3fd6cd74fedf99b6060f75df00943fda13b65f2 is the first bad commit
> commit f3fd6cd74fedf99b6060f75df00943fda13b65f2
> Author: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date:   Sat Dec 8 12:21:38 2018 +0530
> 
>      fscrypt: remove filesystem specific build config option
> 
>      In order to have a common code base for fscrypt "post read" processing
>      for all filesystems which support encryption, this commit removes
>      filesystem specific build config option (e.g. 
> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION)
>      and replaces it with a build option (i.e. CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION) whose
>      value affects all the filesystems making use of fscrypt.
> 
>      Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>      Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> 

FWIW, The patch at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10725883/ fixes this
problem by removing "select BLOCK if FS_ENCRYPTION" from fs/ubifs/Kconfig.

-- 
chandan