lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8f1e21b-197b-78fc-dc03-606e98c7d783@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jan 2019 15:35:03 +0800
From:   Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:     <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: question about reserve_bios_regions

Hi,

  I am looking into these code via find_trampoline_placement, and I have
some questions still not clear after lots of investigation, hope to get
some hints.

1. How is the value of BIOS_START_MIN(128k) determined? I don't find any
clue about it until now.

2. BIOS_START_MAX is define as 0x9f000U(636k), but both the comments say
640k, is that a quirk or just typo?  I thought the 4k difference is the
quirk, but later I guess the real quirk lies in latter judgment of :

  if (ebda_start >= BIOS_START_MIN && ebda_start < bios_start)


I have checked out commit edce21216a8: ("x86/boot: Reorganize and clean
up the BIOS area reservation code"), still no clue.

-- 
Sincerely,
Cao jin


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ