linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] platform/x86: intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3d6835d2-5064-630f-4e54-49a64bffc58b@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:07:18 -0500
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kupuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] platform/x86: intel_pmc: Make PCI dependency
 explicit

On 1/4/2019 9:20 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is not how it should be fixed.
> 
> First of all, we (Heikki, Sathya, me —  all in Cc list) that this
> driver should be refactored and unified with intel_scu_ipc.
> Then, it has two drivers inside and PCI is just a glue for it which is
> optional. Thus, needs to be split accordingly.

OK. Two questions:

1. How should I change this now?
2. Can you change the Kconfig accordingly after you merge the two drivers?

I'm focused on the build failure at this moment.