linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu_vm: fix boolean expressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <040f2122-cd83-effb-3f1e-2c5755aece2a@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:58:28 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc:     Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Harish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu_vm: fix boolean expressions

Hi Ezequiel,

On 1/4/19 10:40 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hey Gustavo,
> 
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 17:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fix boolean expressions by using logical AND operator '&&'
>> instead of bitwise operator '&'.
>>
>> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>
>> Fixes: 9a4b7d4c769e ("drm/amdgpu: Add vm context module param")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - Update Fixes tag.
>>
> 
> This just fixes a user warning that would be wrongly reported, but
> doesn't fix any other issue.
> 
> Why stable?
> 

Yeah. In this case the tag can be removed.

Happy new year.

Thanks
--
Gustavo