[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51872184-3de0-6e69-60e3-c3b4898dcdfa@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:13:29 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Gopal, Saranya" <saranya.gopal@...el.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com" <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] ALSA:usb audio Higher sample rates on usb audio no
longer working.
On 1/4/19 10:52 AM, Gopal, Saranya wrote:
>>> [ Adding linux-usb ML to Cc, as it's a core USB issue ]
>>>
>>> So the device seems incorrectly advertising as if it were supporting
>>> UAC3 -- assuming the device is still not UAC3-capable.
>>>
>>> IOW, it's a buggy firmware. We need some blacklisting, or revert the
>>> commit for now, unless any real UAC3 device comes up to the market.
>> IIRC an UAC3-capable device is required to expose a backwards-compatible
>> configuration (either UAC1 or UAC2). Maybe an additional test can be
>> done to harden the detection so that UAC3 is only chosen if indeed a
>> second audio configuration is present as well.
>>
>> I also vaguely recall there was talk about adding information in the BOS
>> descriptor, but I don't know if this was ever published.
>>
>> -Pierre
> The current detection logic is that UAC3 configuration is chosen only when a device has a configuration with audio interface supporting UAC3 protocol.
> Additionally, it already makes sure that UAC3 is selected only when there is more than one configuration.
What I meant if that the other configurations are not checked for UAC1
or UAC2 capabilities, you only check that there is more than one
configuration
Powered by blists - more mailing lists