linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 2/3] dt-bindings: pps: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e23a0bfc-ab47-bdc1-7d32-d04ea5a250fd@enneenne.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Jan 2019 18:08:00 +0100
From:   Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To:     Tom Burkart <tom@...sec.com>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ricardo Martins <rasm@...up.pt>,
        James Nuss <jamesnuss@...ometrics.ca>,
        Lukas Senger <lukas@...dolin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/3] dt-bindings: pps: pps-gpio PPS ECHO
 implementation

On 30/12/2018 09:33, Tom Burkart wrote:
> This patch implements the device tree binding changes required for the
> pps echo functionality for pps-gpio, that sysfs claims is available
> already.
> 
> This patch was originally written by Lukas Senger as part of a masters
> thesis project and modified for inclusion into the linux kernel by Tom
> Burkart.

I think this patch it's OK but I'm asking to myself if it should be merged with 
next one... logically it describes what patch 3/3 does so why do we keep them 
separated?

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@...ux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti