linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 05/25] char/nvram: Adopt arch_nvram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Jan 2019 09:56:39 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/25] char/nvram: Adopt arch_nvram_ops

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:08:13AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > > +
> > > +const struct nvram_ops arch_nvram_ops = {
> > > +	.read_byte      = nvram_read_byte,
> > > +	.write_byte     = nvram_write_byte,
> > > +	.get_size       = nvram_get_size,
> > > +};
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_nvram_ops);
> > 
> > I think something this internal should always be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
> > 
> 
> By "internal" do you mean "not involving interests outside of the Linux 
> Foundation"? TBH, I don't know who's affected.

Linux Foundation doesn't matter.

But as far as I can see you export the struct from arch code
for nvram.ko to use them and no one else, which is clearly internal.