[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190104180332.GV6310@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:03:32 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
Cc: vdumpa@...dia.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Snikam@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Expose lazy vfree pages to control via sysctl
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:05:41PM +0530, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
>
> The purpose of lazy_max_pages is to gather virtual address space till it
> reaches the lazy_max_pages limit and then purge with a TLB flush and hence
> reduce the number of global TLB flushes.
> The default value of lazy_max_pages with one CPU is 32MB and with 4 CPUs it
> is 96MB i.e. for 4 cores, 96MB of vmalloc space will be gathered before it
> is purged with a TLB flush.
> This feature has shown random latency issues. For example, we have seen
> that the kernel thread for some camera application spent 30ms in
> __purge_vmap_area_lazy() with 4 CPUs.
You're not the first to report something like this. Looking through the
kernel logs, I see:
commit 763b218ddfaf56761c19923beb7e16656f66ec62
Author: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Date: Mon Dec 12 16:44:26 2016 -0800
mm: add preempt points into __purge_vmap_area_lazy()
commit f9e09977671b618aeb25ddc0d4c9a84d5b5cde9d
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Date: Mon Dec 12 16:44:23 2016 -0800
mm: turn vmap_purge_lock into a mutex
commit 80c4bd7a5e4368b680e0aeb57050a1b06eb573d8
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri May 20 16:57:38 2016 -0700
mm/vmalloc: keep a separate lazy-free list
So the first thing I want to do is to confirm that you see this problem
on a modern kernel. We've had trouble with NVidia before reporting
historical problems as if they were new.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists